1 Institut für Zoologie, Tierärztliche Hochschule
Hannover, Germany
2
University of Science, Vietnam University Hanoi, Vietnam
This section was published as:
Geissmann, T. & Vo Ngoc Thanh, 2001: Preliminary results of a primate survey in northeastern Vietnam, with special reference to gibbons. Asian Primates 7(3-4): 0-4.
A printable pdf-file of this paper can be downloaded here.
Gibbons (Hylobatidae) are among the most endangered
of Vietnamese primates. Gibbon populations can become extinct faster than other primates
because of the following characteristics of gibbon biology: (1.) Intergroup spacing:
Gibbon groups live in exclusive territories; (2.) Small group size: Gibbon groups
usually consist of one adult pair and 1-3 dependent offspring; (3.) Long birth interval:
Wild gibbon pairs give birth to single offspring every 3-4 years; (4.) Late sexual
maturity: Wild gibbons are believed to attain sexual maturity at an age of about
7-8 years.
These characteristics result in relatively low densities of gibbon populations and
slow reproduction. Shooting even a single individual may have a more dramatic impact
on the population numbers than in most other primate species.
Recent research suggests that as many as four different gibbon species are parapatrically
distributed in Vietnam (Geissmann, 1995). One of these, the eastern black gibbon
(Nomascus sp. cf. nasutus), is so poorly known that the problems surrounding
its taxonomic status and the affinities of its populations are not yet finally resolved.
Its distribution area appears to be restricted to Hainan island (1 subspecies) and
to Vietnam, east of the Red river (probably 2 subspecies). It already has become
clear, however, that this must be the rarest and most critically endangered primates
species worldwide. During a survey in 1993, the population on Hainan was estimated
by one of us to count less than 20 individuals (Geissmann, own observation), and
no confirmed sightings are known from northeastern Vietnam since the last museum
specimens were shot in 1965 (Geissmann, 1996, 1997).
A recent survey (Canh & Nhat, 1997) reports a gibbon sighting from Kim Hi forest
(Na Ri district, Bac Kan province). This sighting was made in 1993 (Prof. Pham Nhat,
pers. comm.). In addition, Canh and Nhat (1997) cite a personal communication from
Mr. Do Quang Huy reporting that a gibbon was shot in Than Sa forest (Vo Nhai district,
Thai Nguyen province) in November 1995. Both forests are situated east of the Red
River.
In order to verify these reports and in order to find out whether gibbons still occur
in these forests, we conducted a foot survey in each forest in March 1998. In addition,
we also collected information on all other diurnal nonhuman primates in the survey
area.
The survey was carried out from 6 to 31 March 1998. During the survey period, 13 days were spent traveling by car, making logistic arrangements in the provinces and the districts for field work, conducting interviews with local people, traveling on foot in the forest, and in inactivity due to unfavorable weather conditions. A total of 13 days were spend surveying 2 areas in each the Kim Hi forest and the Than Sa forest (Table 1). The locations of survey areas and villages mentioned in the text are shown in Figure 1.
Name of forest | Name of survey area | Coordinates | Survey days | Total area surveyed |
Kim Hi | "Camp 1" | 22°10'-22°11'N; 106°01'-106°03'E |
3 |
162 km2 |
"Camp 2", Cout valley | 22°11'-22°12'N; 106°00'-106°01'E |
4 |
162 km2 |
|
Than Sa | "Camp 3" | 21°47'-21°48'N; 105°56'-105°57'E |
4 |
95 km2 |
"Camp 4", Lan Ly valley | 21°50'-21°51'N; 105°56'-105°57'E |
2 |
46 km2 |
Fig. 1. Map showing the location of the four survey areas (circles) in northeastern Vietnam.
These areas were selected, after interviews with local people had indicated where
gibbons had been seen most recently. Each day, the team was divided into 3 groups,
each surveying a different section of the area. Survey walks began at 06:00 a.m.
and ended at about 11:30 a.m.. The areas covered by our survey (Table 1, last column)
are minimum estimates. Moreover, the loud gibbon songs may carry as far as 2 km in
the forest.
Results of the surveys and interviews conducted in each area are summarized in Table 2. Direct evidence (animals sighted and/or heard) was obtained for the occurrence of Macaca arctoides in 3 of 4 survey areas and of Trachypithecus francoisi in 1 area. No gibbons were heard or sighted during the survey. Because we were able to survey only small fractions of each forested area, the occurrence of gibbons in these forests is not excluded.
Species |
Kim Hi forest |
Than Sa forest |
||
Camp 1 |
Camp 2 |
Camp 3 |
Camp 4 |
|
Macaca arctoides |
1 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
Macaca assamensis or M. mulatta |
3* |
- |
- |
|
Rhinopithecus avunculus |
4* |
4 |
- |
|
Trachypithecus francoisi |
3 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Nomascus sp. cf. nasutus |
3 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
Legend: 1 = animals observed during this survey; 2 = vocalizations heard during this survey; 3 = reported during the last 3 years; 4 = reports older than 3 years; * = reports referring to Kim Hi area; it is not known whether they are valid for the areas of either camp 1, camp 2, or both.
In each survey locality, several local reported having seen and shot gibbons in recent
years (less than 10 years ago).
In Than Sa, we repeatedly met hunters and loggers, and hunting pressure appears to
be particularly high in this forest. Not only is the resident human population of
Than Sa relatively high (about 2000 people), but Than Sa also harbors an even larger
population of immigrant gold miners (about 10000 people) who also add to the hunting
pressure in the forest.
In Kim Hi, we met only few hunters and loggers and only close to the village (Ban
Ke) from which we walked into the forest. The population of Kim Hi was much smaller
than that of Than Sa (about 300 people). Gold mining was declared illegal in Kim
Hi forest and virtually all gold miners were driven away from the area early in 1998.
The most valuable trees have apparently already been removed from the forest by selective
logging, making Kim Hi less attractive for loggers than Than Sa forest.
Trachypithecus calls were heard only in Kim Hi, not in Than Sa. In addition, the
most recent report for the occurrence of gibbons stems from Kim Hi forest. According
to Mr. Quyen, head of the Kim Hi Forest Station, two hunters from Na Toan village
(An Tinh commune, neighboring Kim Hi commune) shot a black gibbon on 7 March in the
Kim Hi forest, apparently close to the area where - 2 days later - we established
our camp 1. This information became available the day after we left Kim Hi, making
it impossible to visit and interview the 2 hunters.
We identify the most immediate threat to wildlife
conservation in general and of gibbon conservation in particular in the survey areas
as over-utilization of wildlife for trade and subsistence.
The absence of gibbon songs during our survey indicates the number of gibbons must
be extremely low, as compared the surveys carried out by us in other localities of
black crested gibbons at similar latitudes (Yunnan Province, China; Hainan Island,
China; Bokeo Province, Laos), where gibbon songs were heard in the forest every day
(Geissmann, own observations).
To judge by the reports of local people, the number of gibbons surviving in the survey
ares, and probably in the whole part of Vietnam east of the Red River, may be little
more than 20 individuals. If we add to those the gibbons from Hainan (see Introduction),
the total population of the eastern black gibbon may amount to about 50 individuals.
The protection of the species clearly deserves top priority status.
Although the Than Sa forest is part of the Than Sa-Phuong Hoang Nature Reserve, we
found no evidence for the enforcement of wildlife laws and hunting ban in the area.
If a gibbon group should still occur in the areas we surveyed in Than Sa forest (which
we consider unlikely), we don't believe they will survive the next decade.
Although we collected only indirect evidence for the continued occurrence of gibbons
in the areas surveyed by us, we consider the Kim Hi forest, especially the area near
camp 1, an area where a few gibbons may still occur. We therefore urge that a second
survey to this area should be carried out as soon as possible, in order to explore
the area south and east of camp 1, which is more remote from human settlements and
therefore more likely to contain gibbons.
According to Prof. Pham Nhat (pers. comm.), plans exist to establish a nature reserve
in Kim Hi, but implementation is not expected in the near future. We recommend the
creation of a nature reserve in Kim Hi forest, to promulgate and to enforce wildlife
laws and a total hunting ban in the reserve.
We are grateful to the Margot Marsh Biodiversity Fund and IPPL (International Primate Protection League) for financial support of this survey, to PCI (Primate Conservation Inc.) for recommending our project, to MARD (Forestry Protection Department) of Vietnam for permission to carry out research in the Bac Kan and Thai Nguyen provinces, and to Debbie J. Curtis Robert Dallmann and Jacob E. Steiner for reading and commenting upon earlier versions of this manuscript.
Canh, L.X. & Nhat, P. 1997. Report on preliminary
results of survey on Hainan gibbon (Hylobates concolor hainanus). Unpublished
report, Ha Noi, March 1997.
Geissmann,
T. 1995. Gibbon systematics and species identification. Int Zoo News 42:467-501.
Geissmann,
T. 1996. Einsichten in der Affensystematik. UniZürich (Magazin der Universität
Zürich) 1996(2): 71.
Geissmann,
T. 1997. New sounds from the crested gibbons (Hylobates concolor group): First results
of a systematic revision. In: Zissler, D, editor. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Zoologischen
Gesellschaft: Kurzpublikationen - Short Communications, 90. Jahresversammlung 1997
in Mainz. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer. p. 170.